易攝網

 找回密碼
 註冊
搜索
查看: 4114|回復: 8

RICOH GR 定 SONY RX100II

[複製鏈接]
發表於 2013-8-7 12:19:42 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
如不論價錢, 大家會點選 ?  誠意徵求各位意見
發表於 2013-8-7 14:02:39 | 顯示全部樓層
我會簡RX100 II
因為買GR不如買無反..佢仲大部過sony 3N / 5R....又冇得換鏡同定焦..
this is my mind
 樓主| 發表於 2013-8-7 14:10:25 | 顯示全部樓層
RX100II 好似好厚又有280KG....
GR原來仲大部過5R嗎?
發表於 2013-8-7 15:00:42 | 顯示全部樓層
http://camerasize.com/compare/#369,454
可以自己揀其他機比較尺吋

唔計支鏡
GR的確係大部過5R少少既
當然想玩換鏡亦都唔會考慮GR

至於RX100II定GR
其實兩者互不衝突

GR片幅較大 輕巧
操控性一流
呢一點一定要親手玩過試過先體會得到

RX100II片幅雖然細 但高ISO處理非常優異
可變焦 內建WIFI 方便性高

利申 本人係GR用家
發表於 2013-8-7 20:28:23 | 顯示全部樓層
k265807 發表於 2013-8-7 02:02 PM
我會簡RX100 II
因為買GR不如買無反..佢仲大部過sony 3N / 5R....又冇得換鏡同定焦..
this is my mind{:1_1 ...

Well since the size comparison should be between two non changable lens camera... I would say the GR is the better buy since it has a larger sensor and has an excellent 2.8 lens that is superbly sharp. It should also have better control and ergonomics.
the RX100 is only marginally lighter, narrower and shorter, it is however thicker with a smaller sensor.

  • Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 is 13% (15.4 mm) narrower and 5% (2.9 mm) shorter than Ricoh GR.
  • Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 is 3% (1.2 mm) thicker than Ricoh GR.
  • Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 [240 g] weights 2% (5 grams) less than Ricoh GR [245 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).


When comparing the GR with the 5R... looks like the 5R isn't that much smaller than a GR at the same time weighs more (without a lens) and thicker (again without a lens) than a GR.  When you mount a equivalent 28mm lens onto the 5R it would be considerably bigger and heavier than a GR.

  • Sony NEX-5R is 5% (6.2 mm) narrower and 4% (2.2 mm) shorter than Ricoh GR.
  • Sony NEX-5R is 12% (4.2 mm) thicker than Ricoh GR.
  • Sony NEX-5R [276 g] weights 13% (31 grams) more than Ricoh GR [245 g]

The bottom line is that if you are ok with a 28mm fixed prime lens, the GR is the body to get, if you need a zoom and can accept a smaller sensor, the RX100 is great.  If you want an interchangable lens body, there might be more choices than a 5R. For example, perhaps fujifilm xm1.

I personally use a GR to compliment my M9 + 50 noctilux.  It gives me a good traveling combo that has a wide + normal. The GR is also crazy sharp when shooting raw at 2.8... see this.

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7384/9441444388_1d084d60bf_o.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7330/9048414899_f3f71ce35f_o.jpg


 樓主| 發表於 2013-8-8 13:49:42 | 顯示全部樓層
inzite 發表於 2013-8-7 08:28 PM
Well since the size comparison should be between two non changable lens camera... I would say the G ...

i資料長盡, 十分感謝,

聽說新GR發色較淡, CHING有何意見分享? ..... 期待你的回應

P.S. 其實XM-1我也有在留意呢, 色彩是當中的最好的, 不過考慮重量, 配27mm總重都有近400g呢,不太符合隨身機的條件呢...
發表於 2013-8-8 15:20:17 | 顯示全部樓層
 樓主| 發表於 2013-8-9 10:47:32 | 顯示全部樓層

聽說新GR發色較淡, 各位用家有何意見分享?
發表於 2013-8-9 20:30:00 | 顯示全部樓層
Guka 發表於 2013-8-8 01:49 PM
i資料長盡, 十分感謝,

聽說新GR發色較淡, CHING有何意見分享? ..... 期待你的回應

Depending if you shoot raw or jpg, jpg you can use the built in vivid mode, but if you shoot raw, you can adjust your colors through preset while importing if you like, basically color is not an issue now adays anymore unless you purely shoot jpg.

Furthermore, I can actually use my m9 presets for the gr since color wise they are similar enough from raw.  


IN011178 by inzite, on Flickr


IN011129 by inzite, on Flickr

and aside from color, the GR raws give great black and white conversions..


IN010997-Edit by inzite, on Flickr


IN011639-Edit by inzite, on Flickr
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

小黑屋|Archiver|手機版|易攝網  

GMT+8, 2024-3-29 05:41 PM , Processed in 0.117611 second(s), 24 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表