對俄鏡的評論
himarj:俄仔支 20mm MC MIR-20M 以價錢計都算用得過。
MIR-1 37/2.8:
Slayer:37/2.8 is a good lens, cost $400-450 only if you can find.
FTL:The 37/2.8 can be get so long you are willing to hunt around. Just remember to get a decent hood for it. Typical Russian lens, prone to flair if point into the light.
Industar 50mm f/2.8:
There's 3 industar that can be used on SLR, the I-22 is really an Elmar Clone and exhibit likewise though its Tonality is a bit better while contrast and resolution is lower. The I-50 is improved version for the I-22 and exhibiting a better contrast and fairly better color reproduction. But it still exhibits the typical tonal character. Very sharp lens though. The I-61 and its late offering the I-61L/Z is VERY sharp lens but set in a very interesting deep mount allowing close up to 1:3. Also it is Multi-coated to give much better color reproduction. However I would say its Tonality in Lumi scale suffer a bit. The Graduation and render of subtle color tone change is not comparable with the better Volna-9. But it's indeed a sharper lens though.
AhRay:以$280 o黎講,枝鏡得o架。質素可媲美一般日本Standard lens。
攝影男:支鏡d色好好~靚人一流~雖則易fog
攝影男:點試支鏡?收到光圈,對到焦,揀支冇咁多塵已ok
Jupiter-9 85/2:
FTL:I think most of the 90's production 85/2.0 Jupiter-9 are already multi-coated. Although some commented that the multi-coating on them does not improve much as against their earlier simpler coating. I do notice that these newer production J-9 tend to give higher contrast and better neutral color as against the older ones.
The Jupiter-9 is really a clone of the old Zeiss Sonnar. So expect a fair amount of spherical abbr. at wide open. This stop being a concern by 5.6, and by 8.0 its a sharp lens. This lens exhibiting an interesting character. That is its resolution had a dramatic falloff when moved 2/3 way from center when open to 4.0 which is where the abbr set in also. Which made the defocusing so pleasing for portrait. And the Rounded edge and corner smooth out any blemish making this the best range for portrait. However when used at 8.0 or so, its very sharp and made a very good street shoot / candid record tool. Its really 2 distinct difference performance from one lens.
俄仔 85/2.0 成色不俗。
135/2.8 APO:
slayer:
(Link deleted)
It should be not bad, because I saw some Europe forum and said that not bad. The body quality is very good, seem like the Japanese lens. And it should be 300/4.5 production line.
FTL:Of course the 135/2.8 APO is a good lens according to all those who can get one. The problem is that it's not available. Same case as the Yasmer 300/2.8. Sure they were on the catalog, but it's almost impossible to get one (New). |